Comments on: Poker Outs http://www.pokerjerk.net/poker-outs/ I'm better than you at everything (especially Poker) Sun, 16 May 2010 12:40:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: The Poker Jerk http://www.pokerjerk.net/poker-outs/#comment-62 The Poker Jerk Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:34:07 +0000 http://www.pokerjerk.net/?p=121#comment-62 Since you can't see them, you can't count them. Whether they are in an opponents hand or at the bottom of the deck is irrelevant to you. Since you can’t see them, you can’t count them. Whether they are in an opponents hand or at the bottom of the deck is irrelevant to you.

]]> By: Sean http://www.pokerjerk.net/poker-outs/#comment-61 Sean Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:16:28 +0000 http://www.pokerjerk.net/?p=121#comment-61 Dear PJ, I'm pretty good at normal maths but with poker maths I feel like Forrest Gump ... so thank you for your attempts to shine some light into the dark treacly morass of my poker brain... So in calculating outs you ignore the fact that some of your outs will most likely have already been dealt out to your opponents and you just calculate the potential or possible number of cards? Thanks, "Forrest" Dear PJ,

I’m pretty good at normal maths but with poker maths I feel like Forrest Gump … so thank you for your attempts to shine some light into the dark treacly morass of my poker brain…

So in calculating outs you ignore the fact that some of your outs will most likely have already been dealt out to your opponents and you just calculate the potential or possible number of cards?

Thanks,
“Forrest”

]]> By: Do you want to be like Doyle Brunson? Or do you want to be a LOSER? Learn to play Suited Connectors | The Poker Jerk http://www.pokerjerk.net/poker-outs/#comment-52 Do you want to be like Doyle Brunson? Or do you want to be a LOSER? Learn to play Suited Connectors | The Poker Jerk Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:55:48 +0000 http://www.pokerjerk.net/?p=121#comment-52 [...] will assume Doyle has nothing, with the possible exception of a Flush draw. In reality, he has 17 outs, with Flush and Inside Straight draws. Doyle bets, anyone with an Ax or Kx is likely to proceed, [...] [...] will assume Doyle has nothing, with the possible exception of a Flush draw. In reality, he has 17 outs, with Flush and Inside Straight draws. Doyle bets, anyone with an Ax or Kx is likely to proceed, [...]

]]> By: Counting Cards in Poker to Determine Odds and Outs | The Poker Jerk http://www.pokerjerk.net/poker-outs/#comment-5 Counting Cards in Poker to Determine Odds and Outs | The Poker Jerk Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:20:08 +0000 http://www.pokerjerk.net/?p=121#comment-5 [...] your advantage in poker. One way it can help is by doing quick math in your head to determine your outs, in comparison to the pot odds. Both those pages I link to offer detailed advice on each subject, [...] [...] your advantage in poker. One way it can help is by doing quick math in your head to determine your outs, in comparison to the pot odds. Both those pages I link to offer detailed advice on each subject, [...]

]]>